Tiens tiens, les brouteurs se sont enfin réveillés.
Pas trop mal celle-ci :
http://www.aegis.org/topics/hiv_exist.html
"We see these kinds of devious challenges from time to time; there is for example, Kent Hovind's $250,000 reward for "empirical evidence of evolution" (http://www.drdino.com/). Challenges such as this are not intrinsically daft, they can be quite effective when the arguments are sound, the challenge is simple and the conditions are not otherwise strawmen. A good example of this type is James Randi's well constructed challenge for evidence of the paranormal (http://www.randi.org/research/challenge/index.html ). On the face of it, the Virusmyth.com challenge seems scientifically rigorous yet simple; the hallmarks of a good challenge. Unfortunately for the folks at Perth, it merely seems so.
One thing is clear from the response to the researcher who's claimed the prize; the folks over at Virusmyth.com have no intention of allowing the contest to be won. The researcher who has claimed the prize, by the way, is Peter Duesberg, an iconoclastic Berkeley retrovirologist who claims that although HIV does indeed exist, it is not the cause of AIDS. The Perth Group has taken steps to ensure that their challenge will remain unanswered. They do this partly by setting unreasonable rules, partly by constructing strawmen, and partly by moving the goalposts."
Hé JF a tu essayés Papadopoulos???
