Forum Sceptique

1. Rapid onset of “collapse”

2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse (heard by hundreds of firemen and media reporters)

3. Symmetrical “collapse” – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance

4. Squibs, or “mistimed” explosions, at the upper 7 floors seen in the network videos

5. “Collapses” into its own footprint – with the steel skeleton broken up for shipment

6. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

7. Tons of molten Metal found by CDI (Demolition Contractor) in basement (no other possible source than an incendiary cutting charge such as Thermate)

8. Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.

9. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples

10. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional

11. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY

Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
— Richard Gage, AIA

The 6 years since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available.


Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience.

In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside "experts"...

and, quite willing to, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that "the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires". After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the
building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses".

There is however a growing body of very solid evidence regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 building collapse "experts" as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST.

It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly.

After all, if in fact these buildings were professionally demolished with explosives, and since it takes months of planning and engineering to place the explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this entire event could only have been planned and orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S. Government. The questions raised are therefore numerous and ominous that must be answered in the context of a truly independent congressional investigation with subpoena power. We can play a very significant role as building professionals because we have the necessary technical credibility that Congress will respond to. Please join us in calling for a re-investigation.

CulRéKiPu a écrit :Tab... de tab...

C'est rendu que des cons ciarges font des cons férences.

Avez-vous vu ce con de Rodriguez?

http://video.google.fr/videoplay?docid= ... 5879352453

Qui le paye pour raconter son histoire de grand héro miraculé?


Kâli...

CulRéKiPu a écrit :L'épa qui n'a pas l'air d'un con cierge plus que d'un culré (et je m'y connais), raconte comment une bombe a sauté au sous-sol avant que l'avion frappe la tour.
.

CulRéKiPu a écrit :L'épa qui n'a pas l'air d'un con cierge plus que d'un culré (et je m'y connais), raconte comment une bombe a sauté au sous-sol avant que l'avion frappe la tour.

Pis y paraît que y aurait eu plusieurs bombes dans le sous-sol pis aussi dans la tour pis y paraît qu'il se promenait dans les escaliers.

Le gars se promène et fait des conférences pour vivre en plannant sur la mode conspiro.
Y donne un bon show.

surfer a écrit :liste des membre qui sont tous diplomer et reconu par leur ordre professinelle
http://www.ae911truth.org/joinus.php