Merci de nous communiquer cette déclaration du Général de Brouwer.
Au site http://home.nordnet.fr/~phuleux/gnral.htm , on retrouve pas mal la même histoire, toujours sous la plume de de Brouwer.
Par contre, j'ai aussi trouvé le site http://members.aol.com/TPrinty/Belg.html .
On y présente un autre point de vue. En voici quelques extraits :
(vers 35% de la page)
Another problem for radar is that many things will produce an echo. Birds, insects, rain, and other natural objects can produce echoes. Even the radar system itself can produce phantom targets. Simple electronic noise in the transmitter/receiver can be displayed on the screen as a false target.
Concernant plus spécifiquement les incidents du 30-31 mars 1990, en Belgique, on trouve :
(vers 60% de la page)
Initially the data from the F-16s appeared promising and exciting. However, after examining the data carefully, it was determined that all the contacts could be explained. What produced the contacts? According to Auguste Meessen, he feels that cells of warm humid air produced these false echoes. He suggests that these convection cells were the source of all the false echoes seen by the ground stations. The F-16 data indicates that the contacts they recorded were also of this nature. The phenomenal speeds were simply problems with the doppler radar interpreting the speeds relative to the F-16s own motion.
(vers 65%)
It seems that the launching of the F-16s was merely the result of misperceptions of stars and the false echo produced by a factory!
(vers 85%)
It seems that many of the events that took place in Belgium in 1989-1990 were simply misperceptions of ordinary objects. One can not conclusively state that no alien spaceships were seen during this period but a vast majority of the sightings can be explained, including the most spectacular parts of the "wave".
(vers 90%)
Like the Roswell case, when an event such as this has been established as the model UFO event, it is beyond reproach. Authors will quote old data written early on instead of looking at more recent evaluations made by those who personally investigated the case. The admittance of a classic UFO case as being explained is almost unthinkable.
J'ai aussi trouvé http://users.belgacom.net/mleurquin/emission.htm où l'on dit :
"On sait en effet depuis avec certitude que ces échos radars furent provoqués par des phénomènes météorologiques..."
Vous êtes vraiment certain qu'en 1990, dans le ciel Belge, il s'est passé quelque chose de spectaculairement inexplicable? Vous considérez que la preuve est faite?
J'en suis beaucoup moins certain que vous. Pour moi une interprétation en termes de "faux échos radar" + "erreurs des témoins au sol" + "fabrication pure et simple" reste la plus crédible.
Denis
|