http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/ (sites conspirationnistes pourtant !)Assuming that the downed lamp poles were clipped and toppled by an aircraft, their pattern indicates that the aircraft had a wingspan of at least 100 feet. The pattern of unmolested lamp poles and other objects, such as the overhead sign, indicates that the aircraft had a wingspan of not more than 130 feet.
http://jpdesm.pagesperso-orange.fr/pent ... -lamp.html
100 pieds = 30,480 m
130 pieds = 39,624 m
Que Quirant ou un autre se soit trompé sur ce point de détail n'est pas une preuve ! Il faut être gonflé de prendre ses paroles pour l'Evangile quand ça vous arrange ! Quelqu'un aura mal converti les mesures en pieds voilà tout.
Même ces abrutis de CIT parlent d'une envergure de 96 pieds :
Le 737-400 a une envergure de 94 pieds 9 pouces !Also, the minimum hypothetical wingspan required for a flying object to strike all of the light poles is roughly 96 feet -- much larger than a missile.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pentagon/spencer05.htm (autre site conspirationniste)The damage to the lamp poles also enables us to calculate the minimum wingspan of the plane. It shows that the plane must have had a wingspan of at least 100 feet. A Boeing 757 has a wingspan of about 125 feet.
Il suffit d'aller sur Google earth et de mesurer les distances.