Jean-Francois a écrit :il ne concerne pas des informations ultra-sensibles
Wrong
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01 ... -them.html
Some of Hillary Clinton’s emails on her private server contained information so secret that senior lawmakers who oversee the State Department cannot read them without fulfilling additional security requirements.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/13-of-abedin ... -redacted/
[...]demonstrates the Obama administration considers a large percentage of the emails sent through Clinton’s private server too sensitive for Congress or the American public to read.
Of the 725 pages, more than 250 pages were 100 percent redacted, many with “PAGE DENIED” stamped in bold.
H. Clinton n'est pas entièrement responsable des messages contenant de l'information "sensible"
Wrong
http://www.20minutes.fr/monde/1917735-2 ... classified
C’est peut-être la révélation la plus gênante. Hillary Clinton n’a pas eu de formation pour gérer les informations confidentielles. Elle a expliqué aux enquêteurs qu’elle « faisait confiance » « au professionnalisme » de ses interlocuteurs afin que ceux-ci fassent attention à ne pas lui envoyer d’information sensible par email sur son serveur privé.
Alors qu’un document était marqué de la lettre « C », Clinton croyait qu’il s’agissait du numéro de paragraphe. Elle n’a pas réalisé, affirme-t-elle, que cette abréviation signifiait « classified ».
Elle était la Secrétaire d'État américaine, le rôle le lus important après le Président. C'EST
SA RESPONSABILITÉ DE SAVOIR CE QU'ELLE FAIT, BORDEL!
Ça se peut pas être stupide à ce point.
(Clinton, pas vous)
On doit évidemment faire des reproches à Clinton, et s'assurer que des problèmes de ce genre ne surviennent pas à nouveau, mais la manière dont les Pardalis de ce monde s'accrochent à l'histoire des courriels tient de la haine irrationnelle contre les Démocrates.
Et le fait qu'elle semble avoir de gros trous de mémoire?
Incroyable les acrobaties que vous êtes capable de faire pour excuser votre préférée.
Les anti-Clinton exagèrent aussi beaucoup le rôle de H. Clinton dans les histoires impliquant la Fondation Clinton. Et ils "oublient" facilement que la Fondation ne sert pas les intérêts des Clinton mais est un organisme de charité qui s'occupe de programmes sociaux qui ont une influence positive un peu partout dans le monde
.
wrong again.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... ml?hpid=z1
Since its creation in 2001, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation has raised close to $2 billion from a vast global network that includes corporate titans, political donors, foreign governments and other wealthy interests, according to a Washington Post review of public records and newly released contribution data.
[...]
Nearly half of the major donors who are backing Ready for Hillary, a group promoting her 2016 presidential bid, as well as nearly half of the bundlers from her 2008 campaign, have given at least $10,000 to the foundation, either on their own or through foundations or companies they run.
[...]
And many of the foundation’s biggest donors are foreigners who are legally barred from giving to U.S. political candidates. A third of foundation donors who have given more than $1 million are foreign governments or other entities based outside the United States, and foreign donors make up more than half of those who have given more than $5 million.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-cli ... 1424403002
At the same time, those companies were among the many that gave to the Clinton family’s global foundation set up by her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
[...]
At least 60 companies that lobbied the State Department during her tenure donated a total of more than $26 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of public and foundation disclosures.
[...]
At least 44 of those 60 companies also participated in philanthropic projects valued at $3.2 billion that were set up though a wing of the foundation called the Clinton Global Initiative, which coordinates the projects but receives no cash for them.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-cha ... 1426818602
The Clinton Foundation swore off donations from foreign governments when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. That didn’t stop the foundation from raising millions of dollars from foreigners with connections to their home governments
[...]
Some donors have direct ties to foreign governments. One is a member of the Saudi royal family. Another is a Ukrainian oligarch and former parliamentarian. Others are individuals with close connections to foreign governments that stem from their business activities. Their professed policy interests range from human rights to U.S.-Cuba relations.
[...]
All told, more than a dozen foreign individuals and their foundations and companies were large donors to the Clinton Foundation in the years after Mrs. Clinton became secretary of state in 2009, collectively giving between $34 million and $68 million, foundation records show. Some donors also provided funding directly to charitable projects sponsored by the foundation, valued by the organization at $60 million
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
The Clinton Foundation reported Thursday that it has received as much as $26.4 million in previously undisclosed payments from major corporations, universities, foreign sources and other groups … The money was paid as fees for speeches by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Foundation officials said the funds were tallied internally as “revenue” rather than donations, which is why they had not been included in the public listings of its contributors published as part of the 2008 agreement.
Ils se graissent la patte et les pattes de leurs amis , et financent leur campagne sous le couvert d'une organisation charitable.
"To say that you won't respect the results of the election is a direct threat to our Democracy. The peaceful transfer of power is one of the things that makes America, America!…Look, some people are just sore losers.”" Hillary Clinton
(C'est vraiment dommage qu'il ait embauché Conway si tôt dans la campagne... pourvu qu'il redevienne naturel rapidement.)
