Popular Mechanics, des menteurs?

[Petrov]

Certains ici avaient mentionner des études fait par popular mechanics, dans le cas de la démolition du complexe World Trade Center le 11 septembre 2001. Il va falloir que vous changiez de "spécialistes", ils se sont fait prendre à mentir.

Popular Mechanics Lies and Spitzer Denies Justice!

http://www.nyctv.com/Popular_Mechanics_ ... ustice.htm

Popular Mechanics "9/11 Myths" Debunker Cancels Radio Debate

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread222957/pg1

POPULAR MECHANICS: Re: 9/11 Debunking the Debunkers —"The Charles Goyette Show", Wed Aug 2

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Feature- ... oNo=009309

Alex Jones Responds To Ben Chertoff, Popular Mechanics 9/11 Debunking Campaign

http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/090305alexresponds.htm

[YvesF]

Et c'est quoi le message de fond en fait dans tout ça? passeque moi les trucs en anglais ça me fait chier d'aller lire et traduire. C'est que le WTC ne s'est pas effondré à cause de l'avion c'est ça? "Quelqu'un" à fait sauter le reste avec du C4?

[Petrov]

En gros, Popular Mechanics a "debunké" les faits que le mouvement de vérité ont amené. Ce que Pop Mech ont fait dans le fond c'est de la propagande pour discrédité la vérité par des "faits" qui n'en sont pas. Ils sont à la solde des globalistes et ils mentent tout comme eux.

C'est sur que si tu comprends pas trop l'anglais que ce sujet est difficile à suivre pour toi, la pluspart des informations sont diffusées en anglais. Tu peux quand même regarder des vidéos...

[Abel Chemoul]

Alex Jones Responds To Ben Chertoff, Popular Mechanics 9/11 Debunking Campaign

http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/090305alexresponds.htm

Et c'est toujours aussi grotesque, particulièrement ce passage:

'Who is Benjamin Chertoff, the senior researcher at Popular Mechanics who is behind the article? American Free Press har learned that he is none other than a cousin of Michael Chertoff, the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. This means that Hearst paid Benjamin Chertoff to write an article supporting the seriously flawed explanation that is based on a practically non-existent investigation of the terror event that directly led to the creation of the massive national security department his cousin now heads. This is exactly the kind of journalism one would expect to find in a dictatorship like that of Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Because the manager of public relations for Popular Mechanics didn't respond to repeated calls from American Free Press, I called Benjamin Chertoff, the magazine's senior researcher, directly. Chertoff said he was the senior researcher of the piece. When asked if he was related to Michael Chertoff, he said I don't know. Clearly uncomfortable about discussing the matter further, he told me that all questions about the article should be put to the publicist - the one who never answers the phone. Benjamin's mother in Pelham, New York, however, was more willing to talk. Asked if Benjamin was related to the new Secretary of Homeland Security, Judy said, Yes, of course, he is a cousin.'

Attention, si ça continue, on va finir par croire qu' Alex est paranoaïque.

Here's the story, as best as I know: I'm not related to Michael Chertoff, at least in any way I can figure out. We might be distant relatives, 15 times removed, but then again, so might you and I. Bottom line is I've never met him, never communicated with him, and nobody I know in my family has ever met or communicated with him.

As for what my mom said: When Chertoff was nominated to be head of homeland security it was the first I'd heard of him, and the same for my family (and, FYI, we'd already sent the 9/11 issue to the press by then!). My dad and I thought there might be some distant relation. When Chris Bollyn called and asked my mom if there was a relation (introducing himself as only "Chris"), she said "they might be distant cousins." Like much in the conspiracy world, this was taken WAY out of context. (Another case in point: Bollyn called me earlier and asked "Were you the senior researcher on the story?" I said, "I guess so," -- that's not a title I have ever used, nor is it at all common in magazine journalism, but I was the research editor at the time, so it kinda made sense.) Nonetheless, I was one of 9 reporters on the story, not counting editors, photo researchers, photo editors, copy editors, layout designers, production managers, fact-checkers, etc., etc., etc. who worked on this story.