Re: QUESTION À F. G.

Posted by Florence , Jan 21,2002,09:48

http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/home.html "A frequently asked question: Can Theoretical Physics explain paranormal phenomena? I have a theory, but you do not want to hear about it. So do NOT click on A sober explanation (in English). http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/para.html "

(Une question qu'on me pose souvent est "la physique théorique explique-t-elle les phénomènes paranormaux? j'ai une théorie mais vous ne voulez sans doute pas en entendre parler. Ne clickez donc PAS sur "une explication en résumé" (en anglais)

Je suspecte que les qualifications de Mr T'Hoof (prix Nobel de physique 1999) ne sont pas suffisantes pour que M. Gatti tienne compte de leurs écrits ...

Suivi

Re:Re: QUESTION À F. G. --- GATTI (Tue, Jan 22, 2002, 00:21:30) (5103 bytes) +2
- Re:Re:Re QUESTION À F. G. --- André (Tue, Jan 22, 2002, 07:35:08) (605 bytes) +1
  - Re:Re:Re:Re QUESTION À F. G. --- Florence (Tue, Jan 22, 2002, 08:14:05) (310 bytes) +1
    - Modulation variable --- Jean-Francois (Tue, Jan 22, 2002, 12:48:12) (265 bytes) +1
      - Le plat de resistance arrive ! --- GATTI (Tue, Jan 22, 2002, 15:36:55) (1748 bytes) +4
        
        Re2:Le plat de resistance arrive ! --- Tom (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 11:49:32) (352 bytes)
        Pas même un hors d'oeuvre. --- Florence (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 11:07:58) (1234 bytes)
        Re.:Le plat de resistance arrive ! --- Denis (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 09:50:22) (314 bytes)
        Re:Le plat de resistance arrive ! --- Mario T. (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 09:34:27) (500 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Le plat de resistance arrive ! --- Florence (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 11:43:22) (880 bytes) +1
        
        Non, non, juste la reponse sur le poids (variable) du condensat BEC --- Gatti (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 13:32:18) (674 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Non, non, juste la reponse sur le poids (variable) du condensat BEC --- Florence (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 15:20:03) (627 bytes)
        Re:100% --- Bill (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 14:59:20) (759 bytes) +3
        
        Encore un petit tour de manège? --- Jean-Francois (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 03:32:23) (923 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Encore un petit tour de manège? --- Bill (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 08:21:36) (464 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Encore un petit tour de manège? --- Florence (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 09:06:58) (303 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Laissé moi m'amuser --- Bill (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 11:17:26) (422 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Encore un petit tour de manège? --- Jean-Francois (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 09:21:48) (209 bytes)
        
        Amuses gueule pour patienter ! --- GATTI (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 00:24:08) (1089 bytes) +1
        
        Texte masqué --- Denis (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 03:44:32) (166 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Texte masqué --- GATTI (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 06:24:15) (3244 bytes) +2
        
        Physicien ? --- Évariste (Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 23:36:55) (307 bytes)
        La foudre en boule --- Denis (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 17:53:06) (1768 bytes) +1
        
        Re:La foudre en boule --- Gatti (Thu, Jan 24, 2002, 23:21:33) (578 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:La foudre en boule. --- André (Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 20:20:22) (195 bytes)
        Re:Re:La foudre en boule --- Al Zorglub (Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 05:54:09) (391 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:La foudre en boule --- GATTI (Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 07:22:41) (180 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:La foudre en boule --- Florence (Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 07:36:34) (571 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:errata --- Bill (Wed, Jan 23, 2002, 15:02:53) (56 bytes)
- Re:Re:Re: QUESTION À F. G. --- Florence (Tue, Jan 22, 2002, 03:06:20) (1284 bytes) +1
  - Re:Re:Re:Re: QUESTION À F. G. --- Jean-Francois (Tue, Jan 22, 2002, 07:35:39) (173 bytes) +1
    - Oui, mais --- Florence (Tue, Jan 22, 2002, 08:16:06) (101 bytes)