Mais, que trouve-t-on sur Answer in Genesis, dans un article titré "Arguments we think creationists should NOT use", section "Which arguments should definitely not be used?":
"There are no beneficial mutations.’ This is not true, since some changes do confer an advantage in some situations. Rather, we should say, ‘We have yet to find a mutation that increases genetic information, even in those rare instances where the mutation confers an advantage.’ For examples of information loss being advantageous, see Beetle Bloopers: defects can be an advantage sometimes, New eyes for blind cave fish? and Is antibiotic resistance really due to increase in information?" ( http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp )
Bref, le Julien à un métro de retard sur ceux de sa propre paroisse. Ca va être dur pour lui d'admettre que nous avions raison de lui signaler que les mutations ne sont pas forcément des "poisons".
Jean-François
|