Re:Re:religion et sceptiques

Re: Re:Re:Re:magie blanche -coexistence paisible? -- André

Posté par Florence , Nov 17,2002,14:15

"As-tu quelque-chose de plus consistant pour affirmer que le Nouveau testament incite à la violence?"

Que penses-tu de 2000 ans de guerres, invasions, massacres, conversions forcées et autres amusettes pour imposer cette religion purement de paix et d'amour ?

Suivi

Pourquoi les titres des interventions se mêlent-ils?(st) --- André (Nov 17, 22:38, 2002) (0 reads) (1 bytes) +1
- Re:Re:Re:Re2:Religion et sceptiques --- Bruno (Dec 31, 16:40, 1998) (0 reads) (888 bytes)
Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive --- André (Nov 17, 21:59, 2002) (0 reads) (695 bytes) +2
- Re:Re:Re2:Religion et sceptiques --- Florence (Nov 18, 08:00, 2002) (0 reads) (2207 bytes) +2
  - morale supérieure --- Jules (Nov 18, 17:39, 2002) (0 reads) (4951 bytes) +4
    - Re:morale supérieure --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:00, 2002) (0 reads) (463 bytes)
    - A ce propos --- Jean-Francois (Nov 18, 20:33, 2002) (0 reads) (1982 bytes) +4
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- Jules (Nov 18, 21:54, 2002) (0 reads) (1161 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- A Garces (Jan 15, 06:35, 1999) (0 reads) (2608 bytes)
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
    - Re:morale supérieure --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:00, 2002) (0 reads) (463 bytes)
    - A ce propos --- Jean-Francois (Nov 18, 20:33, 2002) (0 reads) (1982 bytes) +4
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- Jules (Nov 18, 21:54, 2002) (0 reads) (1161 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- A Garces (Jan 15, 06:35, 1999) (0 reads) (2608 bytes)
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
  - Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- André (Nov 18, 12:03, 2002) (0 reads) (205 bytes) +1
    - Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Florence (Nov 18, 15:38, 2002) (0 reads) (1043 bytes) +5
      - Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:40, 2002) (0 reads) (612 bytes) +3
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 12, 20:21, 1999) (0 reads) (181 bytes)
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
      - Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Jacquou (Nov 18, 18:48, 2002) (0 reads) (3579 bytes) +6
        
        accord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:09, 2002) (0 reads) (383 bytes) +2
        
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:03, 2002) (0 reads) (2622 bytes)
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:56, 2002) (0 reads) (868 bytes) +4
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        accord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:09, 2002) (0 reads) (383 bytes) +2
        
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:03, 2002) (0 reads) (2622 bytes)
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:56, 2002) (0 reads) (868 bytes) +4
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
      - On tombe dans le vague! --- André (Nov 18, 15:56, 2002) (0 reads) (277 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
      - Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:40, 2002) (0 reads) (612 bytes) +3
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 12, 20:21, 1999) (0 reads) (181 bytes)
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
      - On tombe dans le vague! --- André (Nov 18, 15:56, 2002) (0 reads) (277 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
- Re:Re:Re2:Religion et sceptiques --- Florence (Nov 18, 08:00, 2002) (0 reads) (2207 bytes) +2
  - morale supérieure --- Jules (Nov 18, 17:39, 2002) (0 reads) (4951 bytes) +4
    - Re:morale supérieure --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:00, 2002) (0 reads) (463 bytes)
    - A ce propos --- Jean-Francois (Nov 18, 20:33, 2002) (0 reads) (1982 bytes) +4
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- Jules (Nov 18, 21:54, 2002) (0 reads) (1161 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- A Garces (Jan 15, 06:35, 1999) (0 reads) (2608 bytes)
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
    - Re:morale supérieure --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:00, 2002) (0 reads) (463 bytes)
    - A ce propos --- Jean-Francois (Nov 18, 20:33, 2002) (0 reads) (1982 bytes) +4
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- Jules (Nov 18, 21:54, 2002) (0 reads) (1161 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- A Garces (Jan 15, 06:35, 1999) (0 reads) (2608 bytes)
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
  - Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- André (Nov 18, 12:03, 2002) (0 reads) (205 bytes) +1
    - Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Florence (Nov 18, 15:38, 2002) (0 reads) (1043 bytes) +5
      - Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:40, 2002) (0 reads) (612 bytes) +3
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 12, 20:21, 1999) (0 reads) (181 bytes)
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
      - Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Jacquou (Nov 18, 18:48, 2002) (0 reads) (3579 bytes) +6
        
        accord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:09, 2002) (0 reads) (383 bytes) +2
        
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:03, 2002) (0 reads) (2622 bytes)
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:56, 2002) (0 reads) (868 bytes) +4
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        accord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:09, 2002) (0 reads) (383 bytes) +2
        
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:03, 2002) (0 reads) (2622 bytes)
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:56, 2002) (0 reads) (868 bytes) +4
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
      - On tombe dans le vague! --- André (Nov 18, 15:56, 2002) (0 reads) (277 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
      - Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:40, 2002) (0 reads) (612 bytes) +3
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 12, 20:21, 1999) (0 reads) (181 bytes)
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
      - On tombe dans le vague! --- André (Nov 18, 15:56, 2002) (0 reads) (277 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
Pourquoi les titres des interventions se mêlent-ils?(st) --- André (Nov 17, 22:38, 2002) (0 reads) (1 bytes) +1
- Re:Re:Re:Re2:Religion et sceptiques --- Bruno (Dec 31, 16:40, 1998) (0 reads) (888 bytes)
Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive --- André (Nov 17, 21:59, 2002) (0 reads) (695 bytes) +2
- Re:Re:Re2:Religion et sceptiques --- Florence (Nov 18, 08:00, 2002) (0 reads) (2207 bytes) +2
  - morale supérieure --- Jules (Nov 18, 17:39, 2002) (0 reads) (4951 bytes) +4
    - Re:morale supérieure --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:00, 2002) (0 reads) (463 bytes)
    - A ce propos --- Jean-Francois (Nov 18, 20:33, 2002) (0 reads) (1982 bytes) +4
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- Jules (Nov 18, 21:54, 2002) (0 reads) (1161 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- A Garces (Jan 15, 06:35, 1999) (0 reads) (2608 bytes)
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
    - Re:morale supérieure --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:00, 2002) (0 reads) (463 bytes)
    - A ce propos --- Jean-Francois (Nov 18, 20:33, 2002) (0 reads) (1982 bytes) +4
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- Jules (Nov 18, 21:54, 2002) (0 reads) (1161 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- A Garces (Jan 15, 06:35, 1999) (0 reads) (2608 bytes)
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
  - Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- André (Nov 18, 12:03, 2002) (0 reads) (205 bytes) +1
    - Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Florence (Nov 18, 15:38, 2002) (0 reads) (1043 bytes) +5
      - Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:40, 2002) (0 reads) (612 bytes) +3
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 12, 20:21, 1999) (0 reads) (181 bytes)
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
      - Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Jacquou (Nov 18, 18:48, 2002) (0 reads) (3579 bytes) +6
        
        accord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:09, 2002) (0 reads) (383 bytes) +2
        
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:03, 2002) (0 reads) (2622 bytes)
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:56, 2002) (0 reads) (868 bytes) +4
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        accord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:09, 2002) (0 reads) (383 bytes) +2
        
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:03, 2002) (0 reads) (2622 bytes)
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:56, 2002) (0 reads) (868 bytes) +4
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
      - On tombe dans le vague! --- André (Nov 18, 15:56, 2002) (0 reads) (277 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
      - Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:40, 2002) (0 reads) (612 bytes) +3
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 12, 20:21, 1999) (0 reads) (181 bytes)
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
      - On tombe dans le vague! --- André (Nov 18, 15:56, 2002) (0 reads) (277 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
- Re:Re:Re2:Religion et sceptiques --- Florence (Nov 18, 08:00, 2002) (0 reads) (2207 bytes) +2
  - morale supérieure --- Jules (Nov 18, 17:39, 2002) (0 reads) (4951 bytes) +4
    - Re:morale supérieure --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:00, 2002) (0 reads) (463 bytes)
    - A ce propos --- Jean-Francois (Nov 18, 20:33, 2002) (0 reads) (1982 bytes) +4
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- Jules (Nov 18, 21:54, 2002) (0 reads) (1161 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- A Garces (Jan 15, 06:35, 1999) (0 reads) (2608 bytes)
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
    - Re:morale supérieure --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:00, 2002) (0 reads) (463 bytes)
    - A ce propos --- Jean-Francois (Nov 18, 20:33, 2002) (0 reads) (1982 bytes) +4
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- Jules (Nov 18, 21:54, 2002) (0 reads) (1161 bytes)
      - Re:Scepticisme partagé! --- A Garces (Jan 15, 06:35, 1999) (0 reads) (2608 bytes)
      - Re: Scepticisme à géométrie variable, surtout --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:44, 2002) (0 reads) (428 bytes)
  - Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- André (Nov 18, 12:03, 2002) (0 reads) (205 bytes) +1
    - Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Florence (Nov 18, 15:38, 2002) (0 reads) (1043 bytes) +5
      - Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:40, 2002) (0 reads) (612 bytes) +3
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 12, 20:21, 1999) (0 reads) (181 bytes)
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
      - Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Jacquou (Nov 18, 18:48, 2002) (0 reads) (3579 bytes) +6
        
        accord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:09, 2002) (0 reads) (383 bytes) +2
        
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:03, 2002) (0 reads) (2622 bytes)
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:56, 2002) (0 reads) (868 bytes) +4
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        accord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:09, 2002) (0 reads) (383 bytes) +2
        
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        argument de luther --- Florence (Nov 19, 16:05, 2002) (0 reads) (336 bytes)
        
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:03, 2002) (0 reads) (2622 bytes)
        Re:Re : Désaccord avec Florence --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:56, 2002) (0 reads) (868 bytes) +4
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        Re2: désaccord avec Florence --- Stéphane (Nov 19, 14:20, 2002) (0 reads) (562 bytes) +2
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Finalement ... --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:20, 2002) (0 reads) (360 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 18, 05:01, 1999) (0 reads) (724 bytes) +3
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:réflexion... sceptique --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 20, 16:49, 1999) (0 reads) (395 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:Psycho, placébos et pharmaco --- E.DesRosiers (Jan 19, 16:15, 1999) (0 reads) (5449 bytes)
        Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 01:00, 1999) (0 reads) (786 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Réflexion... Un pensez-y bien! --- Guy Labrecque (Jan 19, 01:46, 1999) (0 reads) (156 bytes) +1
        
        Il y a des raisons pour qu'elles soient des sciences! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 04:29, 1999) (0 reads) (2309 bytes) +1
        
        La science sait tout ? --- Axle (Feb 06, 06:38, 1999) (0 reads) (1530 bytes)
        
        Re:Re:Les lumières qui s'éteignent --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:18, 2002) (0 reads) (239 bytes) +2
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
        
        D'accord avec Florence --- André (Nov 19, 10:54, 2002) (0 reads) (395 bytes) +2
        
        à quoi ça sert ? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 15:26, 2002) (0 reads) (301 bytes)
        Une collaboration est possible! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 19, 00:01, 1999) (0 reads) (1579 bytes) +1
        
        Re:Une collaboration est possible! --- GATTI Francis (Jan 20, 06:37, 1999) (0 reads) (1919 bytes) +1
        
        Re: Tenons-nous au courant! --- Carl Lavoie (Jan 22, 20:13, 1999) (0 reads) (929 bytes)
      - On tombe dans le vague! --- André (Nov 18, 15:56, 2002) (0 reads) (277 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
      - Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Équipement "magnétique" --- Bruno (Nov 18, 19:40, 2002) (0 reads) (612 bytes) +3
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
        
        Re:deuxième essai --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 12, 20:21, 1999) (0 reads) (181 bytes)
        Re:deuxième essai --- Florence (Nov 19, 07:51, 2002) (0 reads) (2166 bytes) +2
        
        Tournons-nous en rond? --- Bruno (Nov 19, 20:04, 2002) (0 reads) (655 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Alain Bonnier (Jan 25, 21:06, 1999) (0 reads) (1567 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite3) --- GATTI Francis (Jan 30, 14:19, 1999) (0 reads) (7311 bytes)
        Re:Re:Re:Re:la preuve arrive (suite2) --- Gatti Francis (Jan 29, 20:18, 1999) (0 reads) (1514 bytes)
      - On tombe dans le vague! --- André (Nov 18, 15:56, 2002) (0 reads) (277 bytes) +2
        
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)
        Re:Re: Religion et sceptique --- Florence (Nov 19, 08:36, 2002) (0 reads) (1590 bytes)